With this contraposition, I try to show that the question of beauty in art goes far beyond mere visual perception. He also rejects any identification of art with beauty, just as he is contrary to any general statement of the laws of art. Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race. Ramachandran, by contrasting his conclusions in the light of the philosophy of art of Arthur Danto, who calls into question that the value of what is purely perceptive might be enough to understand art. Shoe Dog: A Memoir by the Creator of Nike. Fragmentos para una posible historia de la arquitectura moderna en Mxico. From this premise, I question the laws of art enunciated by one of the most prominent researches on neuroaesthetics, Vilayanur S. In spite of the efforts by theorists and historians to construct a canon. To this end, I begin by reviewing the psychologization of beauty that has been carried out by David Hume since the origins of modernity. However, historical¿philosophical revision, such as the one I carry out in this chapter, can shed light on the limits that this approach can have. In particular, great advances have been made in the field of the perception of beauty. Scientific discoveries of neuroscience are apparently explaining all the mysteries of the human brain.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |